- Practice
- Tracking
- Segregation
- Abilities
- Skills
- Educational Levels
- Schooling
Jeannie Oakes argues that tracking in schools is inappropriate and belittles all students below high-ability learning levels. She also argues that high-ability learners achieve just as well when they are mixed with all levels and the average and low-ability students achieve above their normal averages.
- "In low-ability classes, for example, teacher seem to be less encouraging and more punitive, placing more emphasis on discipline and behavior and less on academic learning. Compared to teachers in high-ability classes, they seem to be more concerned about getting students to follow directions, be on time, and sit quietly. Students in low-ability classes more often feel excluded from class activities and ten to find their classmates unfriendly." (Page 170)
- "The quality of classes for average students usually falls somewhere between the high and low-class extreme. For example, in average classes, many teachers expected relatively little of students." (Page 179)
- "Taken together, these typical differences begin to suggest why tracking can and often does work well for top students. Start by providing the best teachers, a concentration of the most successful students and sometimes even the lowest class size. Ass special resources, a sense of superior academic mission, perhaps a parent support group, and these students will get the best education in town." (Page 179)
I really enjoyed reading this piece from Oakes. It was persice and direct. I have never heard of this tracking method before. It's interesting to think teachers and professional educators would even think of separating each level of ability into different classes. I feel like that is complete segregation. As Oakes explains, tracking only caters to the high-ability learners and belittles the rest of the different levels. I feel that in a classroom each student contributes to class no matter what each child's level is.
0 comments:
Post a Comment